Reported by Simon yusuph,| Journalist at wengglobal
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has dismissed allegations by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar that it granted access to its nomination portal to a faction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) led by Nafiu Gombe, describing the claim as inaccurate and unsupported by the commission’s records.
INEC said its official records show that the electoral body has only recognised the leadership structure of the ADC led by former Senate President David Mark, following the party’s internal developments and submissions made to the commission.
The clarification comes amid growing political tensions within the ADC, as different groups continue to assert control over the party’s leadership structure ahead of Nigeria’s future electoral contests.
According to INEC, no nomination portal access was granted to Nafiu Gombe or any faction operating outside the leadership structure recognised by the commission. The electoral umpire maintained that its actions are guided by established procedures, legal requirements, and official documentation submitted by political parties.
The controversy followed claims linked to Atiku and other political actors suggesting that INEC had allowed an alternative ADC leadership group to access its nomination platform, raising concerns over the possibility of competing factions participating in electoral processes under the same party name.
INEC, however, rejected the allegation, insisting that it remains committed to neutrality and transparency in managing Nigeria’s democratic processes.
INEC Clarifies Position on ADC Leadership Dispute
The electoral commission explained that political parties are responsible for resolving internal leadership disputes through constitutional and legal channels, while INEC’s responsibility is limited to recognising party officials based on valid submissions and compliance with electoral laws.
The commission stated that it does not independently determine party leadership but relies on official communications, court decisions where applicable, and relevant provisions of Nigeria’s Electoral Act and party constitutions.
The ADC has recently attracted renewed political attention following efforts by opposition figures and political stakeholders to strengthen collaboration ahead of future elections.
The emergence of different leadership claims within the party has, however, created disagreements over who has the legitimate authority to represent the ADC in official engagements with INEC.
INEC’s latest position appears aimed at clarifying uncertainty surrounding the party’s status and preventing confusion among political stakeholders, candidates, and voters.
Political Background: ADC and Nigeria’s Opposition Landscape
The African Democratic Congress has historically positioned itself as an alternative political platform within Nigeria’s multiparty democracy. Although the party has not held national power, it has participated in several electoral cycles and attracted politicians seeking platforms outside the country’s two dominant parties — the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party.
In recent years, opposition realignment efforts have intensified as political actors explore strategies for strengthening competition in Nigeria’s electoral landscape.
Atiku, who contested the 2023 presidential election under the PDP platform, has remained one of the country’s most prominent opposition figures. His political engagements have focused largely on building stronger opposition coordination and challenging the dominance of the ruling party.
The ADC leadership dispute has therefore attracted attention because of the broader implications for opposition cooperation and electoral preparedness.
Analysts note that political party stability is critical ahead of elections because internal disagreements can affect candidate selection, campaign structures, and public confidence.
INEC Maintains Commitment to Electoral Integrity
INEC has repeatedly stated that its role is to provide a fair and transparent electoral environment for all registered political parties.
The commission has faced increasing scrutiny over its handling of political party matters, particularly regarding internal disputes, candidate nominations, and compliance with electoral regulations.
By denying the allegation involving Nafiu Gombe, INEC has reinforced its position that only recognised party structures will be allowed to conduct official transactions with the commission.
Electoral experts have argued that political parties must strengthen their internal democratic mechanisms to avoid prolonged disputes that could undermine their participation in elections.
According to observers, disputes over party leadership are not uncommon in Nigeria’s political system, where factions often emerge due to disagreements over control, ideology, candidate selection, or strategic direction.
However, such disputes must be resolved through lawful processes to preserve institutional credibility.
Atiku’s Concerns Reflect Broader Opposition Challenges
The disagreement over ADC’s leadership comes at a time when opposition parties are facing pressure to develop stronger organisational structures capable of competing effectively in future elections.
Nigeria’s political environment has traditionally been dominated by large parties with extensive grassroots networks and financial resources.
Smaller parties, including the ADC, have often struggled with internal cohesion and nationwide visibility despite attracting experienced political figures.
Observers believe that opposition parties seeking greater influence must prioritise internal democracy, transparent leadership selection, and clear policy direction.
The controversy also highlights the importance of INEC’s role as an independent referee in Nigeria’s democratic system.
Political analysts have consistently emphasised that public confidence in elections depends not only on voting processes but also on the fairness and transparency of pre-election activities, including party registration, leadership recognition, and candidate nomination.
Reactions and Wider Democratic Implications
The denial by INEC is expected to shape further discussions surrounding the ADC’s internal affairs and the broader opposition movement.
While supporters of different factions continue to present competing narratives, the commission’s position provides clarity on which leadership structure it currently recognises for official purposes.
Political observers say the development underscores the need for political parties to establish stronger internal conflict-resolution mechanisms.
They argue that recurring leadership disputes can distract parties from developing policy proposals and engaging voters on issues affecting Nigerians, including economic growth, security, employment, and governance reforms.
For Nigeria’s democracy to continue strengthening, stakeholders say political competition must be based on credible institutions, clear rules, and respect for lawful procedures.
Conclusion
INEC’s rejection of Atiku’s allegation regarding ADC nomination portal access has added another layer to the ongoing debate over political party leadership and opposition coordination in Nigeria.
The commission maintains that Nafiu Gombe’s faction was never granted access to its nomination portal and that only the David Mark-led ADC leadership is recognised in its official records.
As political realignments continue ahead of future elections, the ability of parties to resolve internal disputes transparently will remain a key factor in determining their credibility and competitiveness.
For Nigeria’s democratic system, the episode serves as a reminder that strong institutions, transparent processes, and respect for established electoral procedures remain essential pillars of political stability.
Sources
- Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) official statements and clarifications on political party recognition.
- Channels Television reports on INEC’s response to Atiku’s allegation.
- Premium Times coverage of ADC leadership developments and INEC’s position.
- The Punch reports on political party disputes and electoral matters.
