Reported by Simon Daniel Yusuph l Journalist at Weng Global
An Abuja High Court has adjourned the alleged assault and battery case involving Nigerian rapper Tochukwu Ojogwu, popularly known as Odumodublvck, until Wednesday, October 14, 2026, after the claimant presented his testimony and supporting evidence in court.
The case was brought by Levi Ogbogiri, known professionally as Kraziecent, who alleges that the rapper assaulted him during a public event on December 16, 2024, and damaged his iPhone 15 Pro Max. Ogbogiri is seeking compensation for medical expenses, a public apology and, alternatively, ₦2 billion in damages.
According to a report by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), published by Vanguard on Tuesday, October 13, the claimant’s counsel, Uchenna Ojembe, told the court that his client was present and ready to proceed with the hearing. However, the defendant and his counsel, Taiwo Akinsulie, were initially absent.
Justice J.O.E. Ajayi ordered a stand-down to allow Odumodublvck and his lawyer to appear before the proceedings continued. The report said they failed to appear after the stand-down.
Ogbogiri subsequently entered the witness box, adopted his witness statements and affidavits, and referred to documentary and digital materials he intends to rely on in support of his claims.
After hearing the claimant and considering the evidence presented, the court adjourned the matter to allow the defence to cross-examine him.
The adjournment means the dispute remains before the court, with the claimant’s allegations yet to be finally determined through the judicial process.
Claimant Presents Testimony and Supporting Evidence
At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Ogbogiri’s lawyer informed the court that the claimant was ready to proceed with the case.
The claimant reportedly adopted witness statements and affidavits dated February 25, 2026, and asked the court to grant the reliefs sought in his suit.
According to the NAN report, Ogbogiri referred to several categories of evidence, including medical records, photographs, digital materials, WhatsApp communications and payment receipts.
He also referred to contractual documents involving Walex Biz Nigeria Ltd, Shelter Groove Ltd, Capworld Nigeria Ltd and Chinotem Nig Ltd, which he said were relevant to the dispute.
The reported testimony included medical documentation relating to a wrist injury and subsequent treatment. The claimant also referred to photographs and other records that he intends to use to support his account of the incident.
The materials form part of the evidence the claimant says supports his case. Their legal significance and the weight they may carry will depend on the court’s assessment of the evidence and the parties’ arguments.
The presentation of evidence by one party does not, by itself, establish that the allegations have been proved. The defendant is entitled to challenge the claimant’s testimony and supporting materials through the applicable court procedures.
Cross-examination is an important part of that process because it allows the opposing party to question a witness about the account presented, examine inconsistencies where alleged and test the reliability of the evidence.
The court’s decision to adjourn for cross-examination therefore represents a procedural step in the case rather than a final ruling on the allegations.
Defendant and Counsel Were Reportedly Absent
The latest hearing also drew attention to the absence of Odumodublvck and his counsel when the matter was called.
Ojembe reportedly told the court that the defendant and his lawyer were not present, while the claimant was available and prepared to proceed.
The judge ordered a stand-down to provide an opportunity for the defendant and his counsel to appear. However, according to the report, they did not return after the stand-down.
The available report does not establish the reason for their absence on Tuesday. It would therefore be premature to conclude that the absence was deliberate or to attribute a motive to the defendant or his legal team.
The court proceeded to hear the claimant’s testimony and subsequently fixed October 14 for the next stage of the proceedings.
The immediate task is to determine how the hearing will continue and whether the defendant’s side will be present to conduct the cross-examination.
The case has experienced previous adjournments. At a hearing on June 23, 2026, the court reportedly scheduled proceedings for October 13 and 14.
Earlier reports also documented requests for adjournments during the proceedings. However, the circumstances surrounding each postponement have differed, and the reasons for individual adjournments should be considered separately rather than treated as evidence of wrongdoing.
The latest development places the focus on the next hearing and the court’s handling of the evidence already presented.
What the Lawsuit Is About
Ogbogiri instituted the suit in November 2025 over an alleged incident at a public event on December 16, 2024.
He alleges that Odumodublvck assaulted him without provocation while he was recording at the event. He also claims that his iPhone 15 Pro Max was damaged during the incident and that he suffered emotional distress.
These claims are allegations made by the claimant. The available reporting does not establish that the court has made a final finding that the alleged assault occurred or that the defendant is legally responsible for the claimed damage and injuries.
The lawsuit seeks several forms of relief.
According to NAN, the claimant is asking the court to order the defendant to pay his medical expenses and issue a public apology through his social media platforms and in two national newspapers. Alternatively, he is seeking ₦2 billion in damages.
The requested amount represents the claimant’s demand, not a sum awarded by the court.
Whether any compensation, apology or other remedy is justified will depend on the applicable law, the evidence presented and the court’s eventual determination.
The dispute also involves questions about the alleged damage to personal property and the claimant’s account of the physical and emotional consequences of the incident.
The court will have to consider the claims within the scope of the case and determine which matters are supported by admissible and persuasive evidence.
Why Cross-Examination Matters
The next stage is significant because the claimant’s testimony must be examined through the court process.
During cross-examination, the defendant’s legal representative may question the claimant about the events he described, the documents he presented and the connection between the alleged incident and the losses he says he suffered.
The process can help the court assess the consistency of a witness’s account and clarify disputed details.
Questions may arise about the circumstances of the alleged confrontation, the nature of the reported injury, the claimed damage to the phone and the basis for the remedies being sought. These are matters that may be tested during the proceedings; they should not be treated as established disputes or findings beyond what has been reported.
The defendant’s opportunity to challenge the claimant’s account is particularly important in a case involving allegations that could affect a person’s reputation and financial interests.
Equally, the claimant has the right to present evidence and seek remedies through the courts.
A fair hearing requires the court to consider the parties’ respective positions according to the law and the evidence, rather than relying on public commentary or assumptions about either person.
The latest adjournment does not settle the central questions in the suit. Instead, it creates an opportunity for the next stage of the hearing to proceed.
Previous Adjournments and the Progress of the Case
The case has been adjourned several times since it was brought before the court.
In June 2026, NAN reported that the court moved the matter to October 13 and 14 after the defence sought another adjournment to prepare for its case.
At that hearing, the claimant’s counsel reportedly opposed the request, referring to previous adjournments and asking the court to consider imposing costs if the matter was postponed again.
The defence counsel objected to the proposed ₦500,000 cost and asked that any adjournment be granted without that condition.
The judge subsequently encouraged cooperation between the lawyers before the court fixed the October dates.
A separate report by TheCable Lifestyle in May 2026 said the matter had previously been adjourned after the defence sought a postponement because its counsel was reportedly outside the court’s jurisdiction.
The report also stated that the judge had warned that appropriate orders could be made if the defence counsel failed to appear at the next hearing.
These earlier accounts provide context for the latest proceedings, but they do not independently establish the reasons for the defendant’s absence on October 13.
The repeated postponements are relevant because court delays can increase the time and expense required for parties to resolve disputes. They may also prolong uncertainty for those involved.
However, adjournments can arise for different procedural reasons, and the court must balance the need to move cases forward with the parties’ right to a fair hearing.
The next hearing will provide a further indication of how the case progresses.
Odumodublvck’s Public Profile and the Importance of Due Process
Odumodublvck is a Nigerian rapper whose professional name is associated with the country’s contemporary music scene. The case has attracted public attention because it concerns a prominent entertainer and allegations arising from a public event.
Public interest in the matter does not change the legal standard that applies to the proceedings.
Allegations against a public figure should be reported accurately, with clear distinctions between claims made by a party and facts established by a court.
The same standard applies to the claimant. His allegations and requested remedies should be reported fairly, without dismissing his account simply because the defendant is a recognised musician.
Neither public prominence nor public criticism should substitute for evidence.
The case also illustrates the importance of resolving disputes through established legal procedures. Where a person alleges physical injury or damage to property, the courts provide a forum for presenting evidence and seeking remedies under the law.
The process gives the opposing party an opportunity to respond and allows a judicial officer to assess the issues.
For readers following the case, the most important distinction is between the allegations made in the suit, the evidence presented so far and any eventual findings or orders issued by the court.
At this stage, the claimant has presented his account and referred to supporting materials. The case has not been finally determined in the reporting available for this article.
What Happens Next?
The court has adjourned the matter until Wednesday, October 14, 2026, for the next stage of proceedings, with cross-examination of Ogbogiri expected to be central to the hearing.
The defence will have the opportunity to question the claimant about his testimony and the evidence he has referenced, subject to the court’s directions.
Further proceedings will determine how the parties’ evidence and arguments are considered. The exact timetable for completing the case cannot be established from the latest report alone.
The court has not been reported as awarding the claimant ₦2 billion, ordering a public apology or making a final finding that Odumodublvck committed the alleged assault.
Those remain matters for the judicial process.
The next hearing will therefore be important in determining whether the case advances through the planned cross-examination or encounters further procedural delays.
For now, the central facts are that the claimant has presented testimony and referred to documentary and digital evidence, the defendant and his counsel were reportedly absent after a stand-down, and the court has fixed October 14 for the proceedings to continue.
Weng Global will distinguish between the allegations and any eventual judicial findings as further verified information becomes available.
Weng Global – stories beyond borders
Sources
- News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), reporting published by Vanguard on October 13, 2026.
- Vanguard, report on the June 23, 2026, adjournment.
- TheCable Lifestyle, report on the May 2026 adjournment.
